The impact of positive and negative emotions on the change process

Personal characteristics and previous experiences with change have been shown to affect how we, as individuals, respond and react to change. How we react to change as individuals and the factors associated with our emotional responses will be discussed in a later section.

Positive and negative emotions experienced during the change process both lead to one typical response among employees...resistance.

Resistance is the most common reaction with the greatest impact on the change process and O’Conner and Fiol (2006) posit that the amount of resistance evoked by change is related to the degree to which change is disruptive for its recipients.

Boever (1999) suggests that most people will resist any kind of change, even if the change is for the better. Moreover, we know that all transition, even welcome transition, is disruptive and it upsets the balance in one’s occupational and social life.

It stands to reason then, that change that is perceived to be unnecessary or not advantageous will typically result in stronger resistance. Further Dowd, Shearer and Davidhizar (1998) suggest that what might seem to be minor change to a manager, can involve an extreme amount of personal effort from staff and that the process of change, whether viewed positively or negatively, will generate some ambivalence and frustration. Resistance therefore may be a coping mechanism that employees use to protect themselves against the instability of the change process.

In addition to resistance, Boever (1999) suggests that employees may actually throw up barriers to proposed change (fight response) or they may hide from the process, denying the need to change or procrastinate indefinitely (flight response). These reactions are neither constructive nor productive and they will hinder the change initiative.

When poorly planned, change can be exhausting and painful; however, with skillful management, thoughtful preparation and integrity, it can also be exhilarating creative and rewarding (Sears, 1998). In addition, O’Conner and Fiol (2006) propose that when negative reactions produce limited improvements to conditions that pain can actually drive employees toward a willingness to explore new options.

This short video discusses why people in organizations resist change: